Please I would like to propose:

Off topic posters please include OT at the front of your message. Some
of us want to talk about IFR here, since, after all, that is the subject
of the group. And I would like to filter out the off topic posts.

Please. If you respect this group.

"Scott Moore" > wrote in message
news:Oj9kd.488277$mD.42161@attbi_s02...
> Please I would like to propose:
>
> Off topic posters please include OT at the front of your message. Some
> of us want to talk about IFR here, since, after all, that is the subject
> of the group. And I would like to filter out the off topic posts.
>
> Please. If you respect this group.


The folks most likely to go off topic are least likely to respect the group.
Good luck.

Scott Moore wrote:
> Please I would like to propose:
>
> Off topic posters please include OT at the front of your message. Some
> of us want to talk about IFR here, since, after all, that is the subject
> of the group. And I would like to filter out the off topic posts.
>
> Please. If you respect this group.

If you respect this group, you won't put off-topic posts
here at all. They're no more palatable to me with OT
on them than without.

"Scott Moore" > wrote in message
news:Oj9kd.488277$mD.42161@attbi_s02...
>
> Please I would like to propose:
>
> Off topic posters please include OT at the front of your message. Some
> of us want to talk about IFR here, since, after all, that is the subject
> of the group. And I would like to filter out the off topic posts.
>

Why did you not include OT at the front of your message?


>
> Please. If you respect this group.
>

Those that respect this group don't post off topic messages at all.

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

> Why did you not include OT at the front of your message?
>
>
Oddly, discussion of what is topcial (or not), is topical.

>

Ron Natalie wrote:

> Scott Moore wrote:
>
>> Please I would like to propose:
>>
>> Off topic posters please include OT at the front of your message. Some
>> of us want to talk about IFR here, since, after all, that is the subject
>> of the group. And I would like to filter out the off topic posts.
>>
>> Please. If you respect this group.
>
>
> If you respect this group, you won't put off-topic posts
> here at all. They're no more palatable to me with OT
> on them than without.

With OT at the front, you can filter them out.

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

> "Scott Moore" > wrote in message
> news:Oj9kd.488277$mD.42161@attbi_s02...
>
>>Please I would like to propose:
>>
>>Off topic posters please include OT at the front of your message. Some
>>of us want to talk about IFR here, since, after all, that is the subject
>>of the group. And I would like to filter out the off topic posts.
>>
>
>
> Why did you not include OT at the front of your message?
>

You got me, forgot.


--
Samiam is Scott A. Moore

Personal web site: http:/www.moorecad.com/scott
My electronics engineering consulting site: http://www.moorecad.com
ISO 7185 Standard Pascal web site: http://www.moorecad.com/standardpascal
Classic Basic Games web site: http://www.moorecad.com/classicbasic
The IP Pascal web site, a high performance, highly portable ISO 7185 Pascal
compiler system: http://www.moorecad.com/ippas

Good does not always win. But good is more patient.

You just did.



On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 20:33:10 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
> wrote:

>
>"Scott Moore" > wrote in message
>news:Oj9kd.488277$mD.42161@attbi_s02...
>>
>> Please I would like to propose:
>>
>> Off topic posters please include OT at the front of your message. Some
>> of us want to talk about IFR here, since, after all, that is the subject
>> of the group. And I would like to filter out the off topic posts.
>>
>
>Why did you not include OT at the front of your message?
>
>
>>
>> Please. If you respect this group.
>>
>
>Those that respect this group don't post off topic messages at all.
>